Tom Chan

61 papers receiving 987 citations

Peers

Tom Chan
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health Information Management 111
  • Nephrology 123
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • General Health Professions 117
Replace Roy L. Simpson with:
Roy L. Simpson United States
Gwyneth Rees Australia
Natália Fernandes Portugal
Lorraine R Buis United States
Payal Agarwal Canada
Joanne Callen Australia
Kristin Halvorsen Norway
David Jaques Switzerland
Mahnaz Sanjari Iran
Che-Ming Yang Taiwan
Tom Chan relative to Roy L. Simpson United States Roy L. Simpson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Roy L. Simpson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Chan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Chan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Chan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Chan. The network helps show where Tom Chan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Chan Line = papers co-authored together Tom Chan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005115
2 199992
3 201469
4 201353
5 200446
6 200845
7
Ensuring the Quality of Aggregated General Practice Data: Lessons from the Primary Care Data Quality Programme (PCDQ).
200536
8 201635
9 200935
10 201128
11 200428
12
A knowledge-management model for clinical practice.
200326
13 200325
14 201624
15 200624
16 201124
17 201122
18 200820
19 201619
20 200518

About Tom Chan

Tom Chan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Health Information Management, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Technology (6 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (4 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (111 citations), Nephrology (123 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and General Health Professions (117 citations). Tom Chan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Simon de Lusignan, Jeremy van Vlymen, Terence C. Ahern, Nigel Hague, Paul E. Stevens, Sean Hilton, Mel Walker, Dónal O’Donoghue, Hugh Gallagher and Kevin Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, Public Health, BMC Family Practice, Current Medical Research and Opinion and BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact