Peter Allmark

92 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter Allmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Research and Theory 45
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 32
  • General Health Professions 600
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 463
  • Public Administration 56
Replace Maria Lorentzon with:
Maria Lorentzon United Kingdom
Gina Awoko Higginbottom United Kingdom
Margaret H. Kearney United States
Denise Gastaldo Canada
Susan K. Chase United States
Maura Dowling Ireland
Carina Berterö Sweden
Sarah Cowley United Kingdom
Louise Lemieux‐Charles Canada
Peggy‐Anne Field Canada
Peter Allmark relative to Maria Lorentzon United Kingdom Maria Lorentzon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×
Maria Lorentzon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Allmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Allmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Allmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Allmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Allmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Allmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Allmark. The network helps show where Peter Allmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Allmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Allmark Line = papers co-authored together Peter Allmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000159
2 2009143
3 2017133
4 2008110
5 200490
6 201685
7 200678
8 199575
9 199568
10 200263
11 200957
12 200653
13 199551
14 202242
15 201538
16 201736
17 201236
18 200335
19 201832
20 199232

About Peter Allmark

Peter Allmark is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health and Pharmacy, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (28 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (21 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (13 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (45 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (32 citations), General Health Professions (600 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (463 citations) and Public Administration (56 citations). Peter Allmark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Angela Tod, Suzanne M Mason, Katarzyna Karolina Machaczek, Julia Hirst, Katie Shearn, Hilary Piercy, Elizabeth Goyder, Ann McDonnell, Andrew R. Thompson and Jonathan D. Boote. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Medical Ethics, Nursing Philosophy, Health & Social Care in the Community and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact