Peter Allmark

2.9k citations
100 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Allmark

91 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter Allmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Research and Theory 45
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 33
  • General Health Professions 591
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 451
  • Public Administration 56
Replace Maria Lorentzon with:
Maria Lorentzon United Kingdom
Denise Gastaldo Canada
Gina Higginbottom Canada
Stephanie Wheeler United Kingdom
Sarah Cowley United Kingdom
Jennifer Leeman United States
Carina Berterö Sweden
Margaret H. Kearney United States
Charlotte Clarke United Kingdom
Maura Dowling Ireland
Peter Allmark relative to Maria Lorentzon United Kingdom Maria Lorentzon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Maria Lorentzon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Allmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Allmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Allmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Allmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Allmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Allmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Allmark. The network helps show where Peter Allmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Allmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Allmark Line = papers co-authored together Peter Allmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000153
2 2009139
3 2017128
4 2008110
5 200490
6 201683
7 199576
8 200675
9 199565
10 200261
11 200957
12 200652
13 199551
14 201538
15 201237
16 201736
17 200335
18 202234
19 199232
20 199332

About Peter Allmark

Peter Allmark is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Physiology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (28 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (20 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Public Health Policies and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (45 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations), General Health Professions (591 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (451 citations) and Public Administration (56 citations). Peter Allmark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Angela Tod, Suzanne Mason, Hilary Piercy, Julia Hirst, Elizabeth Goyder, Andrew R. Thompson, Ann McDonnell, Jonathan Boote, Amanda Clarke and Eleni Chambers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Medical Ethics, Nursing Philosophy, Health & Social Care in the Community and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact