E. Mark Curtis

1000 citations
20 papers · 580 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

E. Mark Curtis

19 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers

E. Mark Curtis
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Management Information Systems 146
  • Accounting 152
  • Strategy and Management 131
  • Economics and Econometrics 226
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 124
Replace Jorge Mota with:
Jorge Mota Portugal
Sisira Kumara Naradda Gamage Sri Lanka
Cynthia Van Hulle Belgium
Michela Soverchia Italy
Alessandro Manello Italy
Brent McKnight Canada
Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin Malaysia
Mohammad Al‐Shboul United Arab Emirates
Mohd Haizam Mohd Saudi Indonesia
E. Mark Curtis relative to Jorge Mota Portugal Jorge Mota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Jorge Mota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Mark Curtis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Mark Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Mark Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Mark Curtis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Mark Curtis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Mark Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Mark Curtis. The network helps show where E. Mark Curtis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside E. Mark Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Mark Curtis Line = papers co-authored together E. Mark Curtis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2006107
2 2017103
3 201973
4 201668
5 201652
6 201451
7 201628
8 202126
9 201813
10 20239
11 20219
12 20168
13 20247
14 20186
15 20196
16 20185
17 20224
18 20193
19 20232
20 20230

About E. Mark Curtis

E. Mark Curtis is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems, Accounting, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Environmental Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change Policy and Economics (5 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (5 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (4 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (2 papers) and Energy Efficiency and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (146 citations), Accounting (152 citations), Strategy and Management (131 citations), Economics and Econometrics (226 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (124 citations). E. Mark Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Breda Sweeney, Jonathan Lee, Gale Boyd, Christopher Humphrey, William S. Turley, Ryan A. Decker, Naoko Komori, Ioana Marinescu, Mary C. Schroeder and Barry T. Hirsch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Accounting Organizations and Society and Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact