E. Mark Curtis

1000 citations
22 papers · 629 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

E. Mark Curtis

21 papers receiving 596 citations

Peers

E. Mark Curtis
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Management Information Systems 169
  • Accounting 169
  • Strategy and Management 149
  • Economics and Econometrics 228
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 124
Replace Jorge Mota with:
Jorge Mota Portugal
Xiahai Wei China
Cynthia Van Hulle Belgium
Sisira Kumara Naradda Gamage Sri Lanka
Alessandro Manello Italy
Bao Wu China
Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin Malaysia
Burak Erkut Cyprus
Mohammad Al‐Shboul United Arab Emirates
E. Mark Curtis relative to Jorge Mota Portugal Jorge Mota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Jorge Mota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Mark Curtis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Mark Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Mark Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Mark Curtis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Mark Curtis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Mark Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Mark Curtis. The network helps show where E. Mark Curtis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside E. Mark Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Mark Curtis Line = papers co-authored together E. Mark Curtis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006110
2 2017109
3 201973
4 201672
5 201654
6 201451
7 201629
8 202126
9 201718
10 201414
11 201813
12 20239
13 20219
14 20168
15 20248
16 20186
17 20196
18 20185
19 20224
20 20193

About E. Mark Curtis

E. Mark Curtis is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems, Accounting, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Environmental Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (5 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (4 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (2 papers) and Energy Efficiency and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (169 citations), Accounting (169 citations), Strategy and Management (149 citations), Economics and Econometrics (228 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (124 citations). E. Mark Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Breda Sweeney, Jonathan Lee, Gale Boyd, Christopher Humphrey, William S. Turley, Ryan A. Decker, Naoko Komori, Anne M. Lillis, Ioana Marinescu and Mary C. Schroeder. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Accounting and Business Research, European Accounting Review and Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact