Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

56.9k citations
914 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Accounting top 0.5%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Risk Management in Financial Firms
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
    • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
    • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Papers in

    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 755
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 332
    • Risk Management in Financial Firms 111
    • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 60

Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

812 papers receiving 49.3k citations

Peers

Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Accounting 48.4k
  • Strategy and Management 17.8k
  • Management Information Systems 8.8k
  • General Decision Sciences 1.7k
  • Finance 7.6k
Replace Accounting Horizons with:
Accounting Horizons United States
European Accounting Review United Kingdom
The Journal of Law Economics and Organization United States
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy United States
Review of Accounting Studies United States
Journal of Economic Surveys United Kingdom
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy United States
The British Accounting Review United Kingdom
Journal of Business Venturing United States
Abacus Australia
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory relative to Accounting Horizons United States Accounting Horizons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Accounting Horizons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory.

About Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

The 914 papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory in the last decades have received a total of 56.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory usually cover Accounting (771 papers), General Decision Sciences (60 papers), Management Information Systems (145 papers), Strategy and Management (207 papers) and Finance (118 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (755 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (332 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (153 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (130 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (111 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (82 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (60 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory are Jere R. Francis, K. Raghunandan, Lawrence J. Abbott, Gary F. Peters, W. Robert Knechel, Susan W. Parker, Joseph V. Carcello, Marshall A. Geiger, Gopal V. Krishnan and Roger Simnett.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact