Environmental Engineering

823.2k papers and 20.8M indexed citations i.

About

823.2k papers covering Environmental Engineering have received a total of 20.8M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Wind and Air Flow Studies, Groundwater flow and contamination studies and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications and also cover the fields of Global and Planetary Change, Civil and Structural Engineering and Water Science and Technology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Water Science and Technology. Some of the most active scholars covering Environmental Engineering are Martinus Th. van Genuchten, Derek R. Lovley, Bruce E. Logan, Noel Cressie, T. R. Oke, Florian Menter, Christopher Bishop, Boqiang Lin, C. S. Holling and B.W. Ang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Environmental Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Environmental Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Environmental Engineering.

Countries where authors publish papers about Environmental Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Environmental Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Environmental Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Engineering more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025