E. Claeys

1.7k citations
34 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

E. Claeys

34 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

E. Claeys
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Animal Science and Zoology 885
  • Insect Science 352
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 144
  • Cell Biology 164
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 114
Replace R.H. Jacob with:
R.H. Jacob Australia
Yuan H. Brad Kim United States
Jin‐Yeon Jeong South Korea
Inho Hwang South Korea
Tomáš Komprda Czechia
M.C. Cabrera Uruguay
Brian K. Thompson Canada
Fátima Santos-Silva Portugal
G. Gandemer France
Magdalena Montowska Poland
E. Claeys relative to R.H. Jacob Australia R.H. Jacob's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
R.H. Jacob · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Claeys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Claeys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Claeys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Claeys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Claeys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Claeys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Claeys. The network helps show where E. Claeys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Claeys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Claeys Line = papers co-authored together E. Claeys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016250
2 200395
3 199488
4 200078
5 199475
6 199571
7 200363
8 199258
9 200256
10 200655
11 200649
12 199748
13 200148
14 201538
15 200137
16 200136
17 200734
18 200730
19 201229
20 196922

About E. Claeys

E. Claeys is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Cell Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology and Food Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (21 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (4 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (885 citations), Insect Science (352 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (144 citations), Cell Biology (164 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (114 citations). E. Claeys has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Daniel I. Demeyer, Stefaan De Smet, L. Uytterhaegen, Katleen Raes, Valério Giaccone, Marco Cullere, Antonella Dalle Zotte, Giulia Tasoniero, An Balcaen and Lindsey Haak. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, animal, Journal of Animal Science, Biochimie and International Journal of Food Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact