Devon Powers

25 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Devon Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Music 138
  • Urban Studies 87
  • Marketing 67
  • Communication 52
  • Gender Studies 54
Replace Abigail De Kosnik with:
Abigail De Kosnik United States
Jonathan Bean United States
Jennifer Radbourne Australia
Hilary Glow Australia
Rebekah Willett United States
Christian Jantzen Denmark
Daniel Ashton United Kingdom
Malcolm Barnard United Kingdom
Stefan Meisiek Australia
Elisabeth Soep United States
Devon Powers relative to Abigail De Kosnik United States Abigail De Kosnik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Abigail De Kosnik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Devon Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Devon Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devon Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devon Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Devon Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devon Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devon Powers. The network helps show where Devon Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Devon Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Devon Powers Line = papers co-authored together Devon Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015136
2 202367
3 201663
4
Blowing up the brand : critical perspectives on promotional culture
201041
5 201641
6 201424
7 202320
8 201517
9 202016
10 201915
11 201511
12 201811
13 20118
14 20068
15 20107
16 20124
17 20094
18 20223
19 20222
20 20192

About Devon Powers

Devon Powers is a scholar working on Music, Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Urban Studies and Marketing, having authored 27 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music History and Culture (8 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (3 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (3 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers) and Advancements in Battery Materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (138 citations), Urban Studies (87 citations), Marketing (67 citations), Communication (52 citations) and Gender Studies (54 citations). Devon Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Wade Morris, Bethany Klein, Leslie M. Meier, Melissa Aronczyk, Pallab Barai, Yuepeng Zhang, Sanja Tepavcevic, Michael J. Counihan, Venkat Srinivasan and Shiyu Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Popular Music & Society, Journal of Consumer Culture, Journalism Studies, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Creative Industries Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact