Countries where authors publish in Journalism Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journalism Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journalism Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journalism Studies more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journalism Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journalism Studies.
About Journalism Studies
The 1.9k papers published in Journalism Studies in the last decades have received a total of 42.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Journalism Studies usually cover Communication (1.4k papers), Gender Studies (214 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (210 papers), Philosophy (203 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (766 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (1.2k papers), Social Media and Politics (713 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (321 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (178 papers), Media Influence and Politics (172 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (159 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (115 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journalism Studies are Tony Harcup, Deirdre O’Neill, Maxwell McCombs, Jesper Strömbäck, Jane B. Singer, Irene Costera Meijer, Mark Deuze, Silvio Waisbord, Claudia Mellado and Bob Franklin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.