Popular Music & Society

1.3k papers and 6.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Popular Music & Society in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Popular Music & Society usually cover Music (896 papers), Sociology and Political Science (289 papers) and Cultural Studies (178 papers) specifically the topics of Music History and Culture (841 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (138 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Popular Music & Society are George H. Lewis, B. Lee Cooper, Peter Hesbacher, Kembrew McLeod, Mark A. Fox, Tony Mitchell, Charles Fairchild, Martin Cloonan, David Arditi and R. Serge Denisoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Popular Music & Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Popular Music & Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Popular Music & Society.

Countries where authors publish in Popular Music & Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Popular Music & Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Popular Music & Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Popular Music & Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025