Dena Cox

2.4k citations
36 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

  • Marketing top 1%
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
    • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
    • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Papers in

Dena Cox

36 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Dena Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Marketing 790
  • Applied Psychology 312
  • General Decision Sciences 50
  • Literature and Literary Theory 283
  • Health 220
Replace Mark Forehand with:
Mark Forehand United States
Bob M. Fennis Netherlands
Sara Kim United States
Bruce A. Huhmann United States
Mehdi Mourali Canada
Xiaoli Nan United States
Karen Whitehill King United States
Marieke L. Fransen Netherlands
Rachel Goldman United States
Fuyuan Shen United States
Dena Cox relative to Mark Forehand United States Mark Forehand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Mark Forehand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dena Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dena Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dena Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena Cox. The network helps show where Dena Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dena Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dena Cox Line = papers co-authored together Dena Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001209
2 2003191
3 1993184
4 1990153
5 1988129
6 201094
7 198786
8 199370
9 200570
10 201464
11
Deviant Consumer Behavior
198960
12 201656
13 199350
14 201040
15 201537
16 200634
17 201429
18 201429
19 201029
20 200625

About Dena Cox

Dena Cox is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Health, Literature and Literary Theory and Applied Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (8 papers), Media Influence and Health (8 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (790 citations), Applied Psychology (312 citations), General Decision Sciences (50 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (283 citations) and Health (220 citations). Dena Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Anthony D. Cox, Gregory D. Zimet, James J. Kellaris, Ronald D. Anderson, William B. Locander, George P. Moschis, Lynne A. Sturm, Susan Powell Mantel, Marieke Q. Werrij and Gert‐Jan de Bruijn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marketing, Health Psychology, Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of Consumer Research and American Business Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact