David Scott

80 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 421
  • Family Practice 111
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 56
  • General Health Professions 368
  • Emergency Medical Services 98
Replace Jack E. Fincham with:
Jack E. Fincham United States
Bruce A. Berger United States
Laura Hansen United States
Brenda L. Gleason United States
Erin R. Holmes United States
Diane E. Beck United States
Therese I. Poirier United States
Virtudes Pérez‐Jover Spain
Lotte Stig Nørgaard Denmark
Maggi Banning United Kingdom
David Scott relative to Jack E. Fincham United States Jack E. Fincham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jack E. Fincham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Scott. The network helps show where David Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Scott Line = papers co-authored together David Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Professional Doctorates: Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge
2004128
2 2006118
3 199664
4 199848
5 201637
6 198535
7 198834
8 199733
9 200632
10 199731
11 201030
12 200928
13 201128
14 200925
15 201023
16 201023
17 201723
18 201021
19 201117
20 198917

About David Scott

David Scott is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (42 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (421 citations), Family Practice (111 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (56 citations), General Health Professions (368 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (98 citations). David Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Friesner, Andrew Brown, Ingrid Lunt, Sam C. Augustine, Jeffrey N. Baldwin, Bruce L. Howe, Charles D. Peterson, Fred F. Behrens, Donald R. Miller and John C. Rotschafer. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice and Substance Abuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact