Daniel Friesner

1.6k citations
134 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Friesner

119 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Friesner
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Research and Theory 37
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 143
  • Family Practice 24
  • Leadership and Management 13
  • General Health Professions 234
Replace Antoinette de Bont with:
Antoinette de Bont Netherlands
Stanley S. Wallack United States
Judy A. Brown Canada
Carol S. Borrill United Kingdom
Laurel A. Eisenhauer United States
Stephen Strasser United States
Andrew N. Garman United States
George J. Knafl United States
Charles F. Seifert United States
Ann L Casebeer Canada
Daniel Friesner relative to Antoinette de Bont Netherlands Antoinette de Bont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Antoinette de Bont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Friesner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Friesner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Friesner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Friesner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Friesner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Friesner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Friesner. The network helps show where Daniel Friesner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Friesner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Friesner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Friesner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010107
2 201567
3 200465
4 201859
5 201946
6 201042
7 200338
8 201234
9 201131
10 201030
11 200928
12 200727
13 201726
14 201023
15 201422
16 200921
17 201420
18 201419
19 201217
20 200917

About Daniel Friesner

Daniel Friesner is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Accounting, Finance and General Health Professions, having authored 134 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (24 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (14 papers), Housing Market and Economics (13 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (9 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (8 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (37 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (143 citations), Family Practice (24 citations), Leadership and Management (13 citations) and General Health Professions (234 citations). Daniel Friesner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Robert Rosenman, David Meerman Scott, Cynthia A. Naughton, Ching‐I Teng, Tsung‐Lan Chu, Emanuel Tanne, Brenna M. Lobb, Hao‐Yuan Chang, Vivek H. Patil and Donald Ray Miller. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Journal of Economic Issues, Multinational Business Review and Pharmacy Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact