David Masser

2.7k citations
85 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

David Masser

81 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

David Masser
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Geometry and Topology 1.1k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 438
  • Mathematical Physics 454
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 155
  • Theoretical Computer Science 40
Replace Umberto Zannier with:
Umberto Zannier Italy
Jan‐Hendrik Evertse Netherlands
Jonathan Pila United Kingdom
Michael Rosen United States
Attila Pethő Hungary
Kenneth A. Ribet United States
Alexei N. Skorobogatov United Kingdom
Peter Shiu United Kingdom
David Goss United States
Robert Rumely United States
David Masser relative to Umberto Zannier Italy Umberto Zannier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Umberto Zannier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Masser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Masser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Masser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Masser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Masser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Masser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Masser. The network helps show where David Masser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside David Masser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Masser Line = papers co-authored together David Masser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198672
2
199969
3 198368
4 197567
5 200755
6 198940
7 201036
8 199335
9 200633
10 198033
11 201132
12 199031
13 199329
14 199329
15 198527
16 200826
17 198124
18 198222
19 201520
20 199620

About David Masser

David Masser is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (58 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (23 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (19 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (14 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (13 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (10 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (7 papers) and Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (1.1k citations), Algebra and Number Theory (438 citations), Mathematical Physics (454 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (155 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (40 citations). David Masser has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Umberto Zannier, Enrico Bombieri, Gisbert Wüstholz, W. Dale Brownawell, Jeffrey D. Vaaler, Peter Shiu, M Anderson, Pietro Corvaja, Daniel Bertrand and Yuri Bilu. Their work appears in journals such as Inventiones mathematicae, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematische Annalen and Annals of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact