Daniel Bertrand

86 papers receiving 858 citations

Peers

Daniel Bertrand
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Algebra and Number Theory 98
  • Geometry and Topology 178
  • Mathematical Physics 117
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 203
  • Theoretical Computer Science 10
Replace Helmut Länger with:
Helmut Länger Austria
Alice Rogers United Kingdom
Nils A. Baas Norway
James F. Glazebrook United States
Patrick Desrosiers Canada
Ovidiu Lipan United States
Stephan Stolz United States
Sanefumi Moriyama Japan
Man-Sun Kim South Korea
Eleonora Alfinito Italy
Daniel Bertrand relative to Helmut Länger Austria Helmut Länger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Helmut Länger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bertrand

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bertrand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bertrand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bertrand more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bertrand

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bertrand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bertrand. The network helps show where Daniel Bertrand may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bertrand, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bertrand Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bertrand links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993346
2 199766
3 200046
4 199537
5 200437
6 197032
7 199925
8 199725
9 199725
10 198521
11 199521
12
DELPHI: Technical Proposal
198316
13 199515
14 198813
15 197111
16 197711
17 198010
18 20099
19 20048
20 20018

About Daniel Bertrand

Daniel Bertrand is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Religious studies, Archeology and Molecular Biology, having authored 106 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (20 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (12 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (8 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (8 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (8 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (98 citations), Geometry and Topology (178 citations), Mathematical Physics (117 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (203 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (10 citations). Daniel Bertrand has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Sonia Bertrand, Anne Devillers‐Thiéry, Jean-Luc Eiselé, Jean‐Pierre Changeux, Jean‐Luc Galzi, Ian C. Forster, Frits Beukers, Pierre-Jean Corringer, Eleonora Palma and Eckart D. Gundelfinger. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics B, Neuroreport, Inventiones mathematicae and Annales de l’institut Fourier.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact