David Kolb

732 citations
14 papers · 308 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Education top 10%
    • Reflective Practices in Education
    • Higher Education and Employability
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
    • Educational Games and Gamification

Papers in

David Kolb

12 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

David Kolb
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Education 114
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 42
  • Public Administration 11
  • Human-Computer Interaction 17
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 20
Replace Kath Fisher with:
Kath Fisher Australia
Thomas M. Alexander United States
Stuart Blythe United States
Stephan Schumann Germany
Rebecca Walker Australia
Conrad G. Katzenmeyer United States
Léon de Caluwé Netherlands
Dean R. Spitzer United States
Thomas M. Cavanagh United States
Sarah R. Davies United Kingdom
David Kolb relative to Kath Fisher Australia Kath Fisher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Kath Fisher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Kolb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Kolb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Kolb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Kolb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Kolb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Kolb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Kolb. The network helps show where David Kolb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Kolb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Kolb Line = papers co-authored together David Kolb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2000221
2 199221
3
Socrates in the Labyrinth Hypertext, Argument, Philosophy
199417
4
Hypertext as Subversive
200014
5 19889
6
Self-Esteem Change and Mandatory Experiential Education.
19889
7 19837
8 20094
9 20182
10 19922
11 19951
12 19911
13 20060
14
The necessities of Hegel's logics
20090

About David Kolb

David Kolb is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Architecture, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (4 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (1 paper), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper), Outdoor and Experiential Education (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Cognitive Science and Education Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Education (114 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (42 citations), Public Administration (11 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (17 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (20 citations). Frequent co-authors include Steven A. Moore and Jay David Bolter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the history of philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of Architectural Education, Journal of the History of Ideas and American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact