David Baker

60 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

David Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Health 39
  • Political Science and International Relations 134
  • Sociology and Political Science 176
  • Public Administration 11
  • Clinical Psychology 56
Replace Joan E. Jacoby with:
Joan E. Jacoby United States
Victor N. Shaw United States
Albert J. Meehan United States
Hans Boutellier Netherlands
Melissa Hickman Barlow United States
Arie Perliger United States
Brian Reaves United States
Irene Zempi United Kingdom
C.E.S. Franks Canada
Tom Ellis United Kingdom
David Baker relative to Joan E. Jacoby United States Joan E. Jacoby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joan E. Jacoby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Baker. The network helps show where David Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Baker Line = papers co-authored together David Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201234
2 200817
3 201316
4 200815
5 201614
6 200912
7 201011
8 201910
9 201610
10 201810
11
How different, how similar? : comparing key organizational qualities of American public and private secondary schools
199610
12 200810
13 20199
14 20119
15 20049
16 20179
17 20198
18 20138
19 20078
20 20197

About David Baker

David Baker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 72 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (24 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (11 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (9 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (5 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (39 citations), Political Science and International Relations (134 citations), Sociology and Political Science (176 citations), Public Administration (11 citations) and Clinical Psychology (56 citations). David Baker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Philip Stenning, Otto Adang, Christopher Birkbeck, Thomas Feltes, Mei Han, P. A. J. Waddington, Simon Bronitt, Richard Denniss, Stephen P. Broughman and Daniel Müllensiefen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, Continuum, Police Practice and Research, Crime Law and Social Change and Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact