Mark Webber

3.1k citations
24 papers · 2.7k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Webber

24 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Mark Webber
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Developmental Neuroscience 374
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 131
  • Physiology 767
  • Biological Psychiatry 54
Replace Elisabetta Ciani with:
Elisabetta Ciani Italy
François S. Roman France
Peter Vanhoutte France
Nan‐Jie Xu China
Shenfeng Qiu United States
Christiane Pagès France
José Rodrı́guez-Álvarez Spain
Minee-Liane Choi United Kingdom
David S. Zuzga United States
Gustavo Paratcha Argentina
Mark Webber relative to Elisabetta Ciani Italy Elisabetta Ciani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Elisabetta Ciani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Webber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Webber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Webber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Webber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Webber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Webber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Webber. The network helps show where Mark Webber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Webber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Webber Line = papers co-authored together Mark Webber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002652
2 2002627
3 2002365
4 2008163
5 2005150
6 1997114
7 2006100
8 201779
9 199078
10 200671
11 199062
12 201334
13 201929
14 202427
15 201324
16 201922
17 201822
18 200319
19 202112
20 20237

About Mark Webber

Mark Webber is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Physiology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cancer Research, having authored 24 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Heat shock proteins research (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (2 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (374 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (131 citations), Physiology (767 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (54 citations). Mark Webber has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Hunt, Shui‐Wang Ying, Marie Futter, Kobi Rosenblum, Timothy V. P. Bliss, Clive R. Bramham, Rie Suzuki, Anthony Henry Dickenson, Sara Morcuende and Grace M. Callagy. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neuroscience, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Cancers, Pain and BMC Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact