Daniela Mauer

727 citations
15 papers · 561 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Mauer

15 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Daniela Mauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 72
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 240
  • Biological Psychiatry 22
  • Transplantation 19
  • Pharmacology 117
Replace Tsukasa Koyama with:
Tsukasa Koyama Japan
Gonzalo S. Tejeda United Kingdom
Delphine Bouchet France
Susan Slade United States
Richard J. Prince United States
Omkaram Gangisetty United States
Xuezhu Cai United States
Vincent Marty United States
San Nan Yang Taiwan
Victoria L. Cressman United States
Daniela Mauer relative to Tsukasa Koyama Japan Tsukasa Koyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Tsukasa Koyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Mauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Mauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Mauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Mauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Mauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Mauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Mauer. The network helps show where Daniela Mauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Mauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Mauer Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Mauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201198
2 201785
3 200884
4 200452
5 201050
6 201245
7 198931
8 201228
9 201326
10 201625
11 199714
12 201311
13 20099
14 20142
15 20141

About Daniela Mauer

Daniela Mauer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Social Psychology, Immunology and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (72 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (240 citations), Biological Psychiatry (22 citations), Transplantation (19 citations) and Pharmacology (117 citations). Daniela Mauer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Zimmer, András Bilkei‐Gorzó, Kerstin Michel, Ildikó Rácz, Önder Albayram, Anne Zimmer, Andreas Zimmer, Dietrich Klingmüller, Jean‐Pierre Changeux and Burkhard Schütz. Their work appears in journals such as Human Gene Therapy, Journal of Neuroscience, American Journal of Transplantation, European Journal of Pain and Neurobiology of Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact