Bruno Pradier

25 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Bruno Pradier
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Drug Discovery 5
  • Pharmacology 217
  • Physiology 140
  • Small Animals 29
  • Neurology 23
Replace Mousa Sahebgharani with:
Mousa Sahebgharani Iran
Clarissa Vasconcelos de Oliveira Brazil
Simin Mohseni Sweden
Fazilet Aksu Türkiye
Paula Maria Quaglio Bellozi Brazil
Michal Kluknavský Slovakia
Anderson H.F.F. Leão Brazil
Abhishek Singh India
Glauce Crivelaro Nascimento Brazil
Alejandra Rangel Australia
Bruno Pradier relative to Mousa Sahebgharani Iran Mousa Sahebgharani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.7×
Mousa Sahebgharani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bruno Pradier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bruno Pradier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruno Pradier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruno Pradier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bruno Pradier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruno Pradier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruno Pradier. The network helps show where Bruno Pradier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bruno Pradier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bruno Pradier Line = papers co-authored together Bruno Pradier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013253
2 202196
3 201927
4 202126
5 201523
6 201120
7 201416
8 202116
9 201815
10 201814
11 201313
12 201913
13 202113
14 201810
15 202310
16 20239
17 20228
18 20197
19 20236
20 20236

About Bruno Pradier

Bruno Pradier is a scholar working on Physiology, Pharmacology, Small Animals, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Sensory Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (12 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (2 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Drug Discovery (5 citations), Pharmacology (217 citations), Physiology (140 citations), Small Animals (29 citations) and Neurology (23 citations). Bruno Pradier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Ildikó Rácz, Andreas Zimmer, Anne Markert, Jürg Gertsch, Daniel Segelcke, Esther Miriam Pogatzki-Zahn, Julie A. Kauer, Cornelius Faber, Lydia Wachsmuth and Silke Kreitz. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacological Research, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine, Journal of Neuroscience, Pain and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact