Daniel Wils

1.8k citations
50 papers · 1.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Wils

50 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniel Wils
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 464
  • Pharmaceutical Science 158
  • Gastroenterology 90
  • Food Science 312
  • Physiology 244
Replace Laetitia Guérin‐Deremaux with:
Laetitia Guérin‐Deremaux France
Atsushi Terada Japan
Prasant Kumar Jena United States
Xiaoxiao Li China
Limeng Zhu China
Åsa Håkansson Sweden
Junping Zheng China
Shaoyang Ge China
Martin Beukema Netherlands
Fazheng Ren China
Daniel Wils relative to Laetitia Guérin‐Deremaux France Laetitia Guérin‐Deremaux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Laetitia Guérin‐Deremaux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wils

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wils's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wils with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wils more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wils

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wils. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wils. The network helps show where Daniel Wils may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wils, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Wils Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Wils links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014109
2 201699
3 200679
4 201065
5 201262
6 200458
7 200956
8 201148
9 201147
10 200447
11 200544
12 201542
13 202039
14 201438
15 201338
16 201632
17 200931
18 200331
19 200930
20 201329

About Daniel Wils

Daniel Wils is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Food Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (8 papers), Food composition and properties (8 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (7 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Digestive system and related health (4 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (464 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (158 citations), Gastroenterology (90 citations), Food Science (312 citations) and Physiology (244 citations). Daniel Wils has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Laetitia Guérin‐Deremaux, Larry E. Miller, A.F.M. Kardinaal, Wilrike J. Pasman, Christel Neut, Cheryl Reifer, Juergen Siepmann, F. Siepmann, Pierre Desreumaux and Y. Karrout. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Nutrition, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, British Journal Of Nutrition, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition and Journal of Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact