Daniel Tolks

40 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers

Daniel Tolks
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Family Practice 24
  • General Dentistry 13
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 110
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Health Informatics 10
Replace Lise McCoy with:
Lise McCoy United States
Mary Dankbaar Netherlands
Shoaleh Bigdeli Iran
Margaret Verkuyl Canada
Mohamad Najib Mat Pa Malaysia
Frederick W Kron United States
Natalia Stathakarou Sweden
Luke Woodham United Kingdom
Kalyani Premkumar Canada
Martina Bientzle Germany
Daniel Tolks relative to Lise McCoy United States Lise McCoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Lise McCoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Tolks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Tolks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Tolks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Tolks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Tolks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Tolks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Tolks. The network helps show where Daniel Tolks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Tolks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Tolks Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Tolks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016158
2 201779
3 201638
4 202337
5 202037
6 201733
7 200932
8 201732
9 202025
10 201918
11 202018
12 202018
13 202118
14 201116
15 201815
16
Digitale Lehr- und Lernangebote in der medizinischen Ausbildung: Schon am Ziel oder noch am Anfang?
20188
17 20188
18
Abgrenzung von Serious Games zu anderen Lehr- und Lernkonzepten
20167
19 20187
20 20186

About Daniel Tolks

Daniel Tolks is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching Methods (12 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (10 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (4 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (24 citations), General Dentistry (13 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (110 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations) and Health Informatics (10 citations). Daniel Tolks has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Kühn, Inga Hege, Martin R. Fischer, Claudia Lampert, Kevin Dadaczynski, Kai Sostmann, Christine Schäfer, Antonio Sarikas, Barbara Eichner and Martín Lemos. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, JMIR Medical Education, Frontiers in Public Health, PLoS ONE and JMIR Serious Games.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact