General Dentistry

54.9k papers and 808.7k indexed citations i.

About

54.9k papers covering General Dentistry have received a total of 808.7k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Dental Research and COVID-19, Dental materials and restorations and Dental Health and Care Utilization and also cover the fields of Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Periodontics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Periodontics. Some of the most active scholars covering General Dentistry are Matthias Kern, Jack L. Ferracane, Frederick A. Rueggeberg, David Locker, Franklin R. Tay, Mutlu Özcan, Bart Van Meerbeek, David H. Pashley, Anne Peutzfeldt and Albert J. Feilzer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about General Dentistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering General Dentistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering General Dentistry.

Countries where authors publish papers about General Dentistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in General Dentistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about General Dentistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Dentistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025