Daniel M. Stout

730 citations
30 papers · 472 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel M. Stout

28 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Stout
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 229
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 51
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 269
  • Clinical Psychology 121
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Juyoen Hur with:
Juyoen Hur United States
Rachael M. Tillman United States
Xuebing Li China
Marissa Krimsky United States
Allison Detloff United States
Arne Leer Netherlands
Antonia Pilar Pacheco‐Unguetti Spain
Sara Scheveneels Belgium
Marie-Claude Laplante United States
Min Su Kang United States
Daniel M. Stout relative to Juyoen Hur United States Juyoen Hur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Juyoen Hur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Stout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Stout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Stout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Stout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Stout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Stout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Stout. The network helps show where Daniel M. Stout may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Stout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Stout Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Stout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013109
2 201477
3 201730
4 200928
5 202123
6 201222
7 201818
8 201818
9 201717
10 201816
11 201913
12 201812
13 201911
14 201811
15 20219
16 20197
17 20217
18 20237
19 20087
20 20166

About Daniel M. Stout

Daniel M. Stout is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (229 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (51 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (269 citations), Clinical Psychology (121 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Daniel M. Stout has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christine L. Larson, Alexander J. Shackman, Victoria B. Risbrough, Alan N. Simmons, Jeffrey S. Johnson, Paul D. Rokke, Dean T. Acheson, Daniel E. Glenn, Tara A. Miskovich and Jessica Bomyea. Their work appears in journals such as Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, Cognitive Therapy and Research, Neurobiology of Stress, Biological Psychology and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact