Daniel E. Glenn

1.1k citations
17 papers · 861 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Glenn

17 papers receiving 831 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Glenn
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Applied Psychology 115
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 307
  • Clinical Psychology 278
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 117
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 11
Replace Shari A. Steinman with:
Shari A. Steinman United States
Tracy A. Dennis‐Tiwary United States
Leigh A. Andrews United States
Laura M. Tully United States
Caroline Cellard Canada
Mark J. Boschen Australia
M. Taylor Dryman United States
Lyn Campbell Australia
Ulrike Zetsche Germany
Peter A. Di Nardo United States
Daniel E. Glenn relative to Shari A. Steinman United States Shari A. Steinman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Shari A. Steinman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Glenn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Glenn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Glenn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Glenn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Glenn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Glenn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Glenn. The network helps show where Daniel E. Glenn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Glenn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Glenn Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Glenn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2010183
2 2013137
3 2012132
4 2012124
5 201465
6 201730
7 201730
8 201329
9 201227
10 201522
11 201818
12 201716
13 201614
14 201513
15 201912
16 20118
17
Who Gets the Most Out of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders
20131

About Daniel E. Glenn

Daniel E. Glenn is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 861 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (115 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (307 citations), Clinical Psychology (278 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (117 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (11 citations). Daniel E. Glenn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Genevieve Craske, Richard T. LeBeau, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Katja Beesdo‐Baum, Raphael D. Rose, Betty Liao, Thomas H. Ollendick, Victoria B. Risbrough, Murray B. Stein and Greer Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Depression and Anxiety, Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact