Daniel Intelmann

787 citations
13 papers · 675 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Hops Chemistry and Applications 7
    • Berberine and alkaloids research 1
    • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 8

Daniel Intelmann

13 papers receiving 644 citations

Peers

Daniel Intelmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Pharmacology 319
  • Food Science 399
  • Biochemistry 103
  • Sensory Systems 74
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 158
Replace Gesa Haseleu with:
Gesa Haseleu Germany
Ho-Moon Seog South Korea
K. P. Padmakumari India
Vesna Jerkovic Belgium
B Boros Hungary
Sonia Cortacero‐Ramírez Spain
Jinbong Hwang South Korea
Siripen Jarikasem Thailand
Akihito Takano Japan
Iqbal Azhar Pakistan
Daniel Intelmann relative to Gesa Haseleu Germany Gesa Haseleu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gesa Haseleu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Intelmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Intelmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Intelmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Intelmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Intelmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Intelmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Intelmann. The network helps show where Daniel Intelmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Intelmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Intelmann Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Intelmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200998
2 200988
3 200972
4 200968
5 201167
6 201065
7 200956
8 201052
9 200936
10 200529
11 201624
12 201313
13 20207

About Daniel Intelmann

Daniel Intelmann is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Food Science, Biochemistry, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 675 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (8 papers), Hops Chemistry and Applications (7 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (1 paper) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (319 citations), Food Science (399 citations), Biochemistry (103 citations), Sensory Systems (74 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (158 citations). Daniel Intelmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Frank Hofmann, Gesa Haseleu, Andreas Stephan, Andreas Dunkel, Christina Kühn, Wolfgang Meyerhof, Harald Rohm, Doris Jaros, Oliver Demmer and Roland Fröhlich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Food Chemistry, Chemistry - A European Journal and Phytomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact