Daniel D. Goering

9 papers receiving 579 citations

Daniel D. Goering's Hit Papers

A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge? 2018 · 451 citations
4510+2+5Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Daniel D. Goering
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 217
  • Applied Psychology 39
  • Social Psychology 128
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 40
  • Clinical Psychology 102
Replace Rachel S. Rauvola with:
Rachel S. Rauvola United States
Anya Johnson Australia
Cristiano L. Guarana United States
Danyang Du China
Xiongying Niu China
Andrew Marty Australia
Michelle Singer Foust United States
Ke Michael United States
Jiyun Wu United States
Siti Aisyah Panatik Malaysia
Daniel D. Goering relative to Rachel S. Rauvola United States Rachel S. Rauvola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rachel S. Rauvola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Goering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Goering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Goering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Goering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Goering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Goering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Goering. The network helps show where Daniel D. Goering may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Daniel D. Goering, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel D. Goering Line = papers co-authored together Daniel D. Goering links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge?
Hit paper breakdown →
2018451
2 201747
3 202142
4 201730
5 201614
6 20237
7 20222
8 20162
9 20241

About Daniel D. Goering

Daniel D. Goering is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions and Information Systems and Management, having authored 9 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Social Capital and Networks (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Higher Education and Employability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (217 citations), Applied Psychology (39 citations), Social Psychology (128 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (40 citations) and Clinical Psychology (102 citations). Daniel D. Goering has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ernest H. O’Boyle, Scott E. Seibert, Sheryl L. Walter, Rong Su, Akihito Shimazu, Chao Miao, Matthew W. Rutherford, Joseph E. Coombs, Qi Zhang and Eean Crawford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business and Psychology, Journal of Management, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Business Venturing Insights.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact