Daniel Bonevac
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 12
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 10
- Co-authors
- Nicholas Asher (5 shared papers)Nino B. Cocchiarella (1 shared paper)Lynn Rew (3 shared papers)Michael Mackert (3 shared papers)Josh Dever (2 shared papers)David Sosa (1 shared paper)D. Sosa (1 shared paper)Mandeep Kaur (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synthese (4 papers)Noûs (4 papers)Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Linguistics and Philosophy (2 papers)Erkenntnis (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Bonevac
41 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Philosophy 107
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
- History and Philosophy of Science 36
- Marketing 29
- Artificial Intelligence 101
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bonevac
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bonevac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bonevac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bonevac more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bonevac
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bonevac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bonevac. The network helps show where Daniel Bonevac may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bonevac, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 13 | Deduction: Introductory Symbolic Logic | 1987 | 13 |
| 14 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 17 | Today's moral issues : classic and contemporary perspectives | 2002 | 7 |
| 18 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 20 | Keynote article An evolved definition of the term 'brand': Why branding has a branding problem | 2013 | 6 |
About Daniel Bonevac
Daniel Bonevac is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 47 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (107 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations), Marketing (29 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (101 citations). Daniel Bonevac has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Asher, Nino B. Cocchiarella, Lynn Rew, Michael Mackert, Josh Dever, David Sosa, D. Sosa, Mandeep Kaur, Stephen Phillips and John Bacon. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Noûs, Philosophical Studies, Linguistics and Philosophy and Erkenntnis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.