Frederic Schick

898 citations
33 papers · 610 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Frederic Schick

30 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Frederic Schick
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • General Decision Sciences 278
  • Philosophy 192
  • History and Philosophy of Science 33
  • Economics and Econometrics 72
  • Management Science and Operations Research 35
Replace Jordan Howard Sobel with:
Jordan Howard Sobel Canada
Elijah Millgram United States
Ronald Jay Allen United States
Martín Steinmann
Samuel A. Swift United States
Reinhard Tietz Germany
Matti Sintonen Finland
Marc Jekel Germany
Bernhardt Lieberman United States
Bernd Lahno Germany
Frederic Schick relative to Jordan Howard Sobel Canada Jordan Howard Sobel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Jordan Howard Sobel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic Schick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic Schick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic Schick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic Schick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic Schick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic Schick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic Schick. The network helps show where Frederic Schick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Frederic Schick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic Schick Line = papers co-authored together Frederic Schick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198698
2 199767
3 198766
4
Making choices a recasting of decision theory
199749
5 200043
6 199142
7 197928
8 196327
9 198427
10 200320
11 196618
12 196918
13 198815
14 197114
15 196313
16 19729
17 19707
18 19787
19 20007
20 19925

About Frederic Schick

Frederic Schick is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (12 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (5 papers), Critical Realism in Sociology (4 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (278 citations), Philosophy (192 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations), Economics and Econometrics (72 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (35 citations). Frederic Schick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Isaac Levi, Edward J. Green, Jerrold J. Katz, Eugene Rochberg‐Halton, Martin Hollis, Richard C. Jeffrey and Adam Morton. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Economics and Philosophy, Theory and Decision, Philosophy of Science and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact