John Heil

5.1k citations
138 papers · 3.0k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

John Heil

124 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

John Heil
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • History and Philosophy of Science 947
  • Philosophy 1.3k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
  • General Decision Sciences 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 616
Replace Robert Kane with:
Robert Kane United States
John Greco United States
Hilary� Kornblith United States
Lynne Rudder Baker United States
Terence Horgan United States
Sydney Shoemaker United States
J. D. Trout United States
Frank Jackson Australia
Stephen Mumford United Kingdom
Ernest Lepore United States
John Heil relative to Robert Kane United States Robert Kane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.8×
Robert Kane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Heil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Heil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Heil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Heil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Heil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Heil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Heil. The network helps show where John Heil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Heil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Heil Line = papers co-authored together John Heil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 138 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003330
2 1986173
3 1988170
4 1994156
5 2001154
6 2012132
7 1992114
8 1999107
9
Nonconsequentialist decisions. Commentaries. Author's reply
199494
10 201483
11 198380
12 200577
13 198176
14 199372
15 196670
16 200860
17 198460
18 199853
19 199853
20 198852

About John Heil

John Heil is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 138 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (33 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (947 citations), Philosophy (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations), General Decision Sciences (86 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (616 citations). John Heil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barry Stroud, C. B. Martin, E. J. Lowe, Leslie Podlog, J. M. Prausnitz, Alfred R. Mele, Stefanie Schulte, Jean‐Claude Baron, Rick Grush and Clark Glymour. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Mind, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact