Joseph E. Harmon

19 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Joseph E. Harmon
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • History and Philosophy of Science 77
  • Literature and Literary Theory 118
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 69
  • Language and Linguistics 59
  • Communication 36
Replace Jack Selzer with:
Jack Selzer United States
J. Elliott Casal United States
Pascal Ragouet France
Walter B. Weimer United States
María José Luzón Spain
George D. Gopen United States
James B. Freeman United States
Budsaba Kanoksilapatham Thailand
Michael H. G. Hoffmann United States
Amy Mandelker United States
Joseph E. Harmon relative to Jack Selzer United States Jack Selzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Jack Selzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph E. Harmon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph E. Harmon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph E. Harmon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph E. Harmon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph E. Harmon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph E. Harmon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph E. Harmon. The network helps show where Joseph E. Harmon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Joseph E. Harmon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph E. Harmon Line = papers co-authored together Joseph E. Harmon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present
2002163
2 2002142
3 201623
4 198916
5 201315
6 200914
7 201013
8 199212
9 19878
10 19948
11 20097
12 20006
13 19926
14
What’s Right About Scientific Writing
19994
15 19863
16 19963
17 20052
18 20251
19 19931

About Joseph E. Harmon

Joseph E. Harmon is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology, Anthropology, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 19 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Writing and Publishing (4 papers), Historical Studies in Science (2 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper) and linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (77 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (118 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (69 citations), Language and Linguistics (59 citations) and Communication (36 citations). Joseph E. Harmon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Alan G. Gross, Michael S. Reidy, Eleonora Tamilia, Jeffrey Bolton, P. Ellen Grant, Scellig Stone, Alexander Rotenberg, Phillip L. Pearl, Christos Papadelis and Melissa Tsuboyama. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, Epilepsia and Social Studies of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact