Joseph E. Harmon

20 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Joseph E. Harmon
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • History and Philosophy of Science 96
  • Literature and Literary Theory 144
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 74
  • Language and Linguistics 83
  • Communication 46
Replace Ana I. Moreno with:
Ana I. Moreno Spain
Jack Selzer United States
María José Luzón Spain
Betty Samraj United States
Ted Underwood United States
Pascal Ragouet France
Budsaba Kanoksilapatham Thailand
Marina Bondi Italy
Kimberly Christen United States
Amy Mandelker United States
Joseph E. Harmon relative to Ana I. Moreno Spain Ana I. Moreno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ana I. Moreno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph E. Harmon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph E. Harmon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph E. Harmon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph E. Harmon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph E. Harmon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph E. Harmon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph E. Harmon. The network helps show where Joseph E. Harmon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Joseph E. Harmon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph E. Harmon Line = papers co-authored together Joseph E. Harmon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present
2002201
2 2002185
3 201625
4 201318
5 198917
6 200915
7 201014
8 199212
9 20099
10 20009
11 19949
12 19878
13 19926
14 20194
15
What’s Right About Scientific Writing
19994
16 19863
17 19963
18 20052
19 20251
20 19931

About Joseph E. Harmon

Joseph E. Harmon is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Anthropology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 21 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Writing and Publishing (4 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Historical Studies in Science (2 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper) and linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (96 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (144 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (74 citations), Language and Linguistics (83 citations) and Communication (46 citations). Joseph E. Harmon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Alan G. Gross, Michael S. Reidy, Scellig Stone, Alexander Rotenberg, Melissa Tsuboyama, Christos Papadelis, P. Ellen Grant, Eleonora Tamilia, Jeffrey Bolton and Phillip L. Pearl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Epilepsia and Technical Communication Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact