Ching‐Jui Chang

1.3k citations
26 papers · 915 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Jui Chang

25 papers receiving 876 citations

Peers

Ching‐Jui Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 382
  • Biological Psychiatry 38
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 124
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
  • Clinical Psychology 111
Replace Utpal Goswami with:
Utpal Goswami India
Laura R. Magni Italy
Marta Serati Italy
Meenakshi Dauwan Netherlands
R. Levy United States
J. K. Larsen Denmark
Stephanie Schindler Germany
Adrian Andrzej Chrobak Poland
Eduardo Pondé de Sena Brazil
Narong Maneeton Thailand
Ching‐Jui Chang relative to Utpal Goswami India Utpal Goswami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Utpal Goswami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Jui Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Jui Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Jui Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Jui Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Jui Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Jui Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Jui Chang. The network helps show where Ching‐Jui Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Jui Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Jui Chang Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Jui Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998231
2 2002189
3 201393
4 199647
5 201042
6 201239
7 201133
8 201730
9 201028
10 200821
11 200821
12 200519
13 200316
14 201316
15 199716
16 201015
17 200514
18 201011
19 20127
20 20207

About Ching‐Jui Chang

Ching‐Jui Chang is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Genetics, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 915 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (382 citations), Biological Psychiatry (38 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (124 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations) and Clinical Psychology (111 citations). Ching‐Jui Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hai‐Gwo Hwu, Wei J. Chen, Yu‐Hui Chang, Tzung‐Jeng Hwang, Kuo‐Chen Wei, S.-H. Ng, Cheng‐Hong Toh, H F Wong, Susan Shur‐Fen Gau and Ling‐Ling Yeh. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact