Sílvia Amoretti

3.4k citations
72 papers · 880 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Sílvia Amoretti

64 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

Sílvia Amoretti
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 460
  • Biological Psychiatry 65
  • Clinical Psychology 190
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Philosophy 46
Replace Adanna Onyejiaka with:
Adanna Onyejiaka United Kingdom
Hannah Myles Australia
Anne Emilie Stürup Denmark
Sara Barbeito Spain
James R. Luke United States
Christoph U. Correll United States
Sanja Kilian South Africa
Itxaso González–Ortega Spain
Matti Penttilä Finland
Duk‐In Jon South Korea
Sílvia Amoretti relative to Adanna Onyejiaka United Kingdom Adanna Onyejiaka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Adanna Onyejiaka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sílvia Amoretti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sílvia Amoretti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sílvia Amoretti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sílvia Amoretti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sílvia Amoretti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sílvia Amoretti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sílvia Amoretti. The network helps show where Sílvia Amoretti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sílvia Amoretti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sílvia Amoretti Line = papers co-authored together Sílvia Amoretti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021113
2 201677
3 202070
4 201865
5 201855
6 202136
7 202031
8 202027
9 201827
10 202122
11 202021
12 202220
13 202120
14 202119
15 202118
16 202015
17 202115
18 202115
19 202113
20 202113

About Sílvia Amoretti

Sílvia Amoretti is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 72 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (39 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (24 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (460 citations), Biological Psychiatry (65 citations), Clinical Psychology (190 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations) and Philosophy (46 citations). Sílvia Amoretti has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Eduard Vieta, Miquel Bernardo, Gisela Mezquida, Carla Torrent, Brisa Solé, Clemente García‐Rizo, Norma Verdolini, Adriane Ribeiro Rosa, Miquel Bioque and Manuel J. Cuesta. Their work appears in journals such as European Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Affective Disorders, Schizophrenia Research, Psychological Medicine and Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact