Dane DeSutter

12 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Dane DeSutter
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 110
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 102
  • Automotive Engineering 77
  • Education 171
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 49
Replace Bonnie Dixon with:
Bonnie Dixon United States
Eun‐Mi Yang United States
Jennifer Wilhelm United States
Maurice M. W. Cheng Hong Kong
Cary A. Supalo United States
Jayashree Ramadas India
Irini Skopeliti Greece
Mark Ullrich Germany
Roland B. Guay United States
Hubertina Thillmann Germany
Dane DeSutter relative to Bonnie Dixon United States Bonnie Dixon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Bonnie Dixon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dane DeSutter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dane DeSutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dane DeSutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dane DeSutter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dane DeSutter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dane DeSutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dane DeSutter. The network helps show where Dane DeSutter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Dane DeSutter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dane DeSutter Line = papers co-authored together Dane DeSutter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201671
2 201765
3 201758
4 202031
5 201825
6 202024
7 20167
8 20196
9 20155
10 20145
11
Designing for Spatial Thinking in STEM: Embodying Perspective Shifts Does Not Lead to Improvements in the Imagined Operations.
20202
12 20141

About Dane DeSutter

Dane DeSutter is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers), Design Education and Practice (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (1 paper) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (110 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (102 citations), Automotive Engineering (77 citations), Education (171 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (49 citations). Dane DeSutter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Mike Stieff, Melanie M. Cooper, Mary Hegarty, Brittland K. DeKorver, Peter Wigmore, Russell Tytler, Vaughan Prain, Shaaron Aınsworth, Sadhana Puntambekar and Hilkka I. Kenttämaa. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Journal of Educational Psychology, Science Education and Topics in Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact