Dana E. King

124 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Dana E. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Health 1.1k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 767
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.5k
  • Physiology 1.1k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 818
Replace Reijo S. Tilvis with:
Reijo S. Tilvis Finland
Arpo Aromaa Finland
Markku Heliövaara Finland
Morten Grønbæk Denmark
Hiroshi Yatsuya Japan
Hideaki Toyoshima Japan
Tetsuya Mizoue Japan
Adrienne O’Neil Australia
Ronny A. Bell United States
Hélène Payette Canada
Dana E. King relative to Reijo S. Tilvis Finland Reijo S. Tilvis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Reijo S. Tilvis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana E. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana E. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana E. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana E. King. The network helps show where Dana E. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana E. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana E. King Line = papers co-authored together Dana E. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Handbook of religion and health, 2nd ed.
2012324
2
Beliefs and attitudes of hospital inpatients about faith healing and prayer.
1994322
3 2009237
4 2003237
5
New classification and update on the quinolone antibiotics.
2000225
6 2012210
7 2005204
8 2003203
9 2012201
10 2007191
11 2018154
12 2000143
13 2003136
14 2004129
15 2002128
16 2005117
17 2007114
18 2008107
19 2002101
20 201296

About Dana E. King

Dana E. King is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Physiology, having authored 129 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (18 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (14 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (9 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (8 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.1k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (767 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.5k citations), Physiology (1.1k citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (818 citations). Dana E. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Arch G. Mainous, Mark E. Geesey, Charles J. Everett, Harold G. Koenig, Brent M. Egan, William S. Pearson, Verna Benner Carson, Robb Malone, Robert E. Post and Carol A. Lambourne. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, The Annals of Family Medicine, BDJ, Diabetes Care and Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact