Jim Mitchell

31 papers receiving 833 citations

Peers

Jim Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Health 229
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 23
  • Marketing 137
  • Clinical Psychology 163
  • General Health Professions 185
Replace Anne Bergen with:
Anne Bergen Canada
Judith Pizarro United States
Marı́a Teresa Muñoz Sastre France
Milena Heinsch Australia
Sally Dunlop Australia
Gregory J. Pool United States
Phillip W. Vaughan United States
Loretta L. Pecchioni United States
Soleman H. Abu-Bader United States
Joyee S. Chatterjee Thailand
Jim Mitchell relative to Anne Bergen Canada Anne Bergen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Anne Bergen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Mitchell. The network helps show where Jim Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jim Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Jim Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003183
2 2002132
3 200289
4 199378
5 200274
6 200353
7 200052
8 199537
9 198933
10 200125
11 199923
12
Gender Issues in Aviation: Pilot Perceptions and Employment Relations
200618
13 198418
14
How pink is the sky? : a cross-national study of the gendered occupation of pilot
200517
15 200815
16 199715
17 200014
18 199414
19 198614
20
Flying glass : a qualitative analysis of pilot perceptions of automated flight-decks after 20 years
20099

About Jim Mitchell

Jim Mitchell is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 33 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (3 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (229 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (23 citations), Marketing (137 citations), Clinical Psychology (163 citations) and General Health Professions (185 citations). Jim Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Holly F. Mathews, Christopher J. Mansfield, Dana E. King, Donald R. Lannin, Melvin Swanson, Jerome A. Yesavage, Raymond G. Miltenberger, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Ronald J. Faber and Jennifer Redlin. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Aging, Journal of Women s Health, Journal of Applied Gerontology, Deviant Behavior and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact