Dan N. Stone

2.5k citations
72 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Dan N. Stone

67 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Dan N. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • General Decision Sciences 118
  • Communication 283
  • Accounting 332
  • Information Systems and Management 193
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 270
Replace Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy with:
Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy United Kingdom
David A. Vollrath United States
Glen Whyte Canada
Leigh Plunkett Tost United States
Peter H. Kim United States
Susanne G. Scott United States
Bruce Barry United States
Robert S. Billings United States
Shmuel Ellis Israel
Terri R. Lituchy Canada
Dan N. Stone relative to Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy United Kingdom Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan N. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan N. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan N. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan N. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan N. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan N. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan N. Stone. The network helps show where Dan N. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan N. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan N. Stone Line = papers co-authored together Dan N. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009250
2 2013236
3 1994178
4 201077
5 199176
6 199553
7 199741
8 200440
9 201837
10 200832
11 201029
12 199729
13 201327
14 200025
15 199424
16 201124
17 200223
18 200923
19 200022
20 201121

About Dan N. Stone

Dan N. Stone is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Social Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (23 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (15 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (9 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Financial Reporting and XBRL (8 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (118 citations), Communication (283 citations), Accounting (332 citations), Information Systems and Management (193 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (270 citations). Dan N. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan, Jason Bergner, David Schkade, Benson Wier, Stephanie M. Bryant, James E. Hunton, David A. Ziebart, Kathryn Kadous and Netta Weinstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Decision Sciences, Accounting Organizations and Society and Accounting Horizons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact