Countries where authors publish in Accounting Horizons
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting Horizons. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting Horizons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting Horizons more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting Horizons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting Horizons.
About Accounting Horizons
The 977 papers published in Accounting Horizons in the last decades have received a total of 52.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Accounting Horizons usually cover Accounting (745 papers), Management Information Systems (204 papers), Strategy and Management (321 papers), Finance (189 papers) and General Decision Sciences (10 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (676 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (288 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (278 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (144 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (130 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (85 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (59 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting Horizons are Ross L. Watts, James M. Wahlen, Paul M. Healy, Robert S. Kaplan, Stephen A. Zeff, D. P. Norton, Katherine Schipper, Douglas J. Skinner, Joseph V. Carcello and Patricia Dechow.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.