D. C. Kendrick
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Personality Traits and Psychology
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Global Health Care Issues 1
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 1
- Mental Health Research Topics 1
- Co-authors
- F. Post (1 shared paper)Hugh L. Freeman (1 shared paper)Amy Ellis (1 shared paper)Paul Blackburn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)Psychological Reports (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
D. C. Kendrick
9 papers receiving 496 citations
D. C. Kendrick's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Applied Psychology 77
- Clinical Psychology 240
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 120
- General Psychology 10
- Social Psychology 124
Countries citing papers authored by D. C. Kendrick
This map shows the geographic impact of D. C. Kendrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. C. Kendrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. C. Kendrick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. C. Kendrick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. C. Kendrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. C. Kendrick. The network helps show where D. C. Kendrick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside D. C. Kendrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Personality Structure and Measurement Hit paper breakdown → | 1970 | 433 |
| 2 | 1965 | 44 | |
| 3 | 1965 | 24 | |
| 4 | 1960 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1967 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1967 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 3 |
About D. C. Kendrick
D. C. Kendrick is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper), Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper), linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (77 citations), Clinical Psychology (240 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (120 citations), General Psychology (10 citations) and Social Psychology (124 citations). D. C. Kendrick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include F. Post, Hugh L. Freeman, Amy Ellis and Paul Blackburn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, The British Journal of Psychiatry, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychological Reports and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.