F. Post

1.1k citations
37 papers · 477 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

F. Post

36 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

F. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 181
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 18
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 89
  • Emergency Medicine 34
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 79
Replace Jodi D. Nadler with:
Jodi D. Nadler United States
Petteri Viramo Finland
Jan Godderis Belgium
A. Guterman United States
Sigurður Pálsson Sweden
P. Hiltunen Finland
Robert A. Maricle United States
Olga Bruna Spain
P V Rabins United States
Lauren L. Drag United States
F. Post relative to Jodi D. Nadler United States Jodi D. Nadler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jodi D. Nadler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Post. The network helps show where F. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Post Line = papers co-authored together F. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195663
2 200859
3 196856
4 196552
5 196751
6 201518
7 201016
8 195715
9 195915
10 195914
11 201111
12 195911
13 195610
14 20009
15 19629
16 19549
17
The value of electroencephalographic examinations in psychiatric disorders of old age.
19589
18 19687
19
Sex and its problems. IX. Disorders of sex in the elderly.
19675
20 19635

About F. Post

F. Post is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Emergency Medicine and Philosophy, having authored 37 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (181 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (18 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (89 citations), Emergency Medicine (34 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (79 citations). F. Post has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include M. B. Shapiro, Antonia Whitehead, James Inglis, D. C. Kendrick, Thomas Münzel, Evangelos Giannitsis, Stefan Perings, Harald Darius, Jochen Senges and Hugo A. Katus. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, The Gerontologist, Public Health, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and EP Europace.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact