C.W. Dill
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 1%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Food Science top 1%
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Papers in
- Food Science 28
- Proteins in Food Systems 11
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes 7
- Food Quality and Safety Studies 5
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 22
- Co-authors
- W. A. Landmann (8 shared papers)P. T. TYBOR (5 shared papers)Z. L. CARPENTER (12 shared papers)G. C. SMITH (8 shared papers)D. Suter (4 shared papers)S. C. Seideman (6 shared papers)C. Vanderzant (9 shared papers)Ronald Richter (17 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Food Protection (17 papers)Journal of Dairy Science (17 papers)Journal of Food Science (16 papers)Notes (3 papers)Cambridge Opera Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungaryChina
In The Last Decade
C.W. Dill
64 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Animal Science and Zoology 514
- Food Science 732
- Nutrition and Dietetics 243
- Music 34
- Biotechnology 70
Countries citing papers authored by C.W. Dill
This map shows the geographic impact of C.W. Dill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.W. Dill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.W. Dill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.W. Dill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.W. Dill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.W. Dill. The network helps show where C.W. Dill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.W. Dill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1974 | 132 | |
| 2 | 1975 | 125 | |
| 3 | 1984 | 101 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 92 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 55 | |
| 6 | 1967 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1978 | 41 | |
| 8 | 1979 | 40 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 39 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 38 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1976 | 28 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 19 | 1979 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1979 | 19 |
About C.W. Dill
C.W. Dill is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology and Music, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (22 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (11 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (7 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (7 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (7 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (5 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (5 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (514 citations), Food Science (732 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (243 citations), Music (34 citations) and Biotechnology (70 citations). C.W. Dill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and China. Frequent co-authors include W. A. Landmann, P. T. TYBOR, Z. L. CARPENTER, G. C. SMITH, D. Suter, S. C. Seideman, C. Vanderzant, Ronald Richter, Cutberto Garza and R.G. MORGAN. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Protection, Journal of Dairy Science, Journal of Food Science, Notes and Cambridge Opera Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.