Colleen Smith

27 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Colleen Smith's Hit Papers

Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration 1992 · 865 citations
8650+11+22Years since publication250500750

Peers

Colleen Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Research and Theory 186
  • Leadership and Management 35
  • Social Psychology 474
  • Sociology and Political Science 769
  • Gender Studies 159
Replace Michael Clinton with:
Michael Clinton United Kingdom
Debra Gilin Canada
Arla Day Canada
Donna S. Martsolf United States
Kathy Ahern Australia
Ann Gallagher United Kingdom
Dawn Freshwater United Kingdom
Marilyn Ryan United States
Carroll Iwasiw Canada
Luca Caricati Italy
Colleen Smith relative to Michael Clinton United Kingdom Michael Clinton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Michael Clinton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colleen Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colleen Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colleen Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colleen Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colleen Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colleen Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colleen Smith. The network helps show where Colleen Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colleen Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colleen Smith Line = papers co-authored together Colleen Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
Hit paper breakdown →
1992865
2 2001135
3 2013119
4 201786
5 199550
6 201140
7 201231
8 201224
9 202019
10 201319
11 200318
12 199915
13 201115
14 199015
15 201113
16 198913
17 201113
18 19919
19 20108
20 20046

About Colleen Smith

Colleen Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Research and Theory, Emergency Medical Services and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (186 citations), Leadership and Management (35 citations), Social Psychology (474 citations), Sociology and Political Science (769 citations) and Gender Studies (159 citations). Colleen Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian Mullen, Rupert Brown, Amanda Kenny, Craig Phillips, Adrian Esterman, Paul Arbon, Franklin H.G. Bridgewater, Morgan Smith, Rasika Jayasekara and Lisa McKenna. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education in Practice, Nurse Education Today, The Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Advanced Nursing and International Journal of Nursing Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact