Michael Clinton

2.3k citations
68 papers · 1.5k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Clinton

64 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael Clinton
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Research and Theory 112
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 348
  • General Health Professions 484
  • Health 132
  • Demography 185
Replace Barbara McIntosh with:
Barbara McIntosh United States
Vickie A. Lambert United States
Clinton E. Lambert United States
Arlene Walker Australia
Margot van der Doef Netherlands
Annatjie Botes South Africa
Joan K. Magilvy United States
Peter P. M. Janssen Netherlands
Chung Lim Vico Chiang Hong Kong
Michael Clinton relative to Barbara McIntosh United States Barbara McIntosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Barbara McIntosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Clinton. The network helps show where Michael Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Clinton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Clinton Line = papers co-authored together Michael Clinton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004102
2 2016102
3 201896
4 201191
5 200078
6 201570
7 200569
8 201360
9 199957
10 200651
11 201346
12 200044
13 200543
14 200641
15 201241
16 201841
17 200534
18 200233
19 200033
20 199932

About Michael Clinton

Michael Clinton is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (112 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (348 citations), General Health Professions (484 citations), Health (132 citations) and Demography (185 citations). Michael Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Hazelton, David Guest, Neil Conway, Jane Sturges, Martin R. Edwards, Trevor Murrells, Sarah Robinson, Alexandra Budjanovcanin, Janet W. H. Sit and Leonard S.W. Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Personnel Review and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact