Clifford Leech

782 citations
45 papers · 153 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Clifford Leech

22 papers receiving 63 citations

Peers

Clifford Leech
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Literature and Literary Theory 82
  • Classics 13
  • Music 10
  • History 33
  • Museology 9
Replace C. G. Thayer with:
C. G. Thayer
John Loftis United States
Jean Seznec United Kingdom
Lawrence Lipking United States
Frederick M. Keener
Donald Davie United States
Alan F. Nagel United States
E. A. J. Honigmann United Kingdom
Arthur H. Scouten United States
James C. Bulman United Kingdom
Clifford Leech relative to C. G. Thayer C. G. Thayer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. G. Thayer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clifford Leech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clifford Leech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clifford Leech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clifford Leech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clifford Leech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clifford Leech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clifford Leech. The network helps show where Clifford Leech may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Clifford Leech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clifford Leech Line = papers co-authored together Clifford Leech links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197627
2 196120
3
The Revels plays
195819
4 196111
5 19559
6 19638
7
John Webster : a critical study
19516
8 19665
9 19664
10 20024
11 19654
12
Christopher Marlowe: Poet for the Stage
19864
13 19583
14 19653
15 19593
16 19653
17
The dramatist's experience, with other essays in literary theory
19702
18 19582
19 19672
20 19662

About Clifford Leech

Clifford Leech is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Music, Economics and Econometrics and Classics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 153 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (14 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper), Philippine History and Culture (1 paper), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper) and Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (82 citations), Classics (13 citations), Music (10 citations), History (33 citations) and Museology (9 citations). Clifford Leech has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert Ornstein, George Williamson, Alfred Harbage, Irving Ribner, Michael R. Booth, Jackson I. Cope, Robertson Davies, G. K. Hunter, Richard Southern and P. G. Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Shakespeare Quarterly, Modern Language Quarterly, Critical Quarterly and Modern Drama.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact