C. G. Thayer
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Papers in
-
- Joseph Conrad and Literature 7
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 7
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
-
- Irish and British Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Fredson Bowers (1 shared paper)Thomas Dekker (1 shared paper)Michael Drayton (1 shared paper)G. E. Bentley (1 shared paper)Jonas A. Barish (1 shared paper)Roland Mushat Frye (1 shared paper)William Shakespeare (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ELH (1 paper)Modern Philology (1 paper)Comparative Literature (1 paper)Educational Theatre Journal (1 paper)The South Central Bulletin (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
C. G. Thayer
18 papers receiving 53 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Classics 27
- Literature and Literary Theory 66
- History 39
- Music 6
- Anthropology 18
Countries citing papers authored by C. G. Thayer
This map shows the geographic impact of C. G. Thayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. G. Thayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. G. Thayer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. G. Thayer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. G. Thayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. G. Thayer. The network helps show where C. G. Thayer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside C. G. Thayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1955 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1960 | 25 | |
| 3 | 1959 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1963 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1955 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1957 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1954 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1962 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1958 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1955 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1964 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1956 | 1 |
About C. G. Thayer
C. G. Thayer is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Classics, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 24 papers that have together received 164 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Joseph Conrad and Literature (7 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (7 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (27 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (66 citations), History (39 citations), Music (6 citations) and Anthropology (18 citations). Frequent co-authors include Fredson Bowers, Thomas Dekker, Michael Drayton, G. E. Bentley, Jonas A. Barish, Roland Mushat Frye and William Shakespeare. Their work appears in journals such as ELH, Modern Philology, Comparative Literature, Educational Theatre Journal and The South Central Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.