John Loftis
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Early Modern Spanish Literature
- Museology top 5%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies
Papers in
-
- Early Modern Spanish Literature 4
-
- Philippine History and Culture 4
- Co-authors
- Alexander Welsh (1 shared paper)Marion Jones (2 shared papers)Robert D. Hume (1 shared paper)Arthur H. Scouten (2 shared papers)Richard Southern (2 shared papers)Betty A. Schellenberg (1 shared paper)John H. McDowell (1 shared paper)Claude Rawson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Eighteenth-Century Studies (3 papers)Comparative Literature (2 papers)Hispanic Review (1 paper)Huntington Library Quarterly (1 paper)Comparative drama (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Loftis
14 papers receiving 56 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 102
- Museology 27
- Music 16
- History 41
- Anthropology 30
Countries citing papers authored by John Loftis
This map shows the geographic impact of John Loftis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Loftis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Loftis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Loftis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Loftis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Loftis. The network helps show where John Loftis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Loftis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 50 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 43 | |
| 3 | 1961 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1959 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 10 | The Theatre, 1720 | 1962 | 3 |
| 11 | 1960 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1953 | 3 | |
| 13 | Trials and the Shaping of Identity in Tom Jones | 2002 | 2 |
| 14 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 16 | Amplification of Shock Overpressure by Reflection within Concave Corners | 1993 | 2 |
| 17 | 1951 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1955 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1975 | 1 |
About John Loftis
John Loftis is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, History, Sociology and Political Science and Museology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (4 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (102 citations), Museology (27 citations), Music (16 citations), History (41 citations) and Anthropology (30 citations). John Loftis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Welsh, Marion Jones, Robert D. Hume, Arthur H. Scouten, Richard Southern, Betty A. Schellenberg, John H. McDowell, Claude Rawson, David Kaufmann and Richard Steele. Their work appears in journals such as Eighteenth-Century Studies, Comparative Literature, Hispanic Review, Huntington Library Quarterly and Comparative drama.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.