Shakespeare Quarterly

2.6k papers and 10.4k indexed citations

About

The 2.6k papers published in Shakespeare Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Shakespeare Quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (265 papers) and Anthropology (200 papers) specifically the topics of Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1.2k papers), Irish and British Studies (190 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Shakespeare Quarterly are Peter Erickson, Michael Neill, Margreta de Grazia, Andrew Gurr, Paul Werstíne, Richard Helgerson, Peter Stallybrass, Katharine Eisaman Maus, Maureen Quilligan and Patricia A. Parker.

In The Last Decade

Shakespeare Quarterly

997 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Shakespeare Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Shakespeare Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Shakespeare Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Shakespeare Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Shakespeare Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Shakespeare Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shakespeare Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026