Countries where authors publish in Modern Language Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Language Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Language Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Language Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Modern Language Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Language Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Language Quarterly.
About Modern Language Quarterly
The 2.2k papers published in Modern Language Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Modern Language Quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (631 papers), Classics (162 papers), History (167 papers), Language and Linguistics (160 papers) and Philosophy (132 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (127 papers), Medieval Literature and History (120 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (71 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (67 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (59 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (50 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (46 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Language Quarterly are Robert F. Barsky, John Robert Moore, George Woodcock, Marshall Brown, Hugh Witemeyer, Malcolm Brown, Jeremy Tambling, Alan D. McKillop, Franco Moretti and Patricia Meyer Spacks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.