Cliff Oswick

69 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Cliff Oswick
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.1k
  • Public Administration 211
  • Strategy and Management 712
  • Communication 315
  • Gender Studies 360
Replace Gail T. Fairhurst with:
Gail T. Fairhurst United States
Yiannis Gabriel United Kingdom
Stanley Deetz United States
François Cooren Canada
Dennis K. Mumby United States
Helen Williams United Kingdom
James R. Meindl United States
Timothy Kuhn United States
Tom Keenoy United Kingdom
Robert P. Gephart Canada
Cliff Oswick relative to Gail T. Fairhurst United States Gail T. Fairhurst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gail T. Fairhurst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cliff Oswick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cliff Oswick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cliff Oswick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cliff Oswick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cliff Oswick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cliff Oswick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cliff Oswick. The network helps show where Cliff Oswick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cliff Oswick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cliff Oswick Line = papers co-authored together Cliff Oswick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009332
2 2004273
3 1998256
4 2011227
5 2002216
6
Metaphor and organizations
1996214
7 2008187
8 2012159
9 2004157
10 2012121
11 1997106
12 2004105
13 201299
14 201198
15 200092
16 200091
17 200984
18 200178
19 200454
20 200549

About Cliff Oswick

Cliff Oswick is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Strategy and Management, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (30 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (12 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (10 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers), Management Theory and Practice (6 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.1k citations), Public Administration (211 citations), Strategy and Management (712 citations), Communication (315 citations) and Gender Studies (360 citations). Cliff Oswick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Keenoy, David Grant, David Grant, David Grant, Nelson Phillips, Gerard Hanlon, David M. Bøje, Jeffrey D. Ford, Peter Fleming and Mike Noon. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Organization, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy and Organization Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact