Christopher Wilde
Impact in
- Pollution top 5%
- Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 1
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 1
-
- Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants 3
- Co-authors
- Joachim Vater (5 shared papers)P. Franke (4 shared papers)Swaranjit Singh Cameotra (1 shared paper)Gerhard Bringmann (2 shared papers)Frank Bernhard (1 shared paper)Ute Hentschel (1 shared paper)Barbara Adler (1 shared paper)J. Hofemeister (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (1 paper)Biochemistry (1 paper)Marine Biotechnology (1 paper)Nature Chemical Biology (1 paper)Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Christopher Wilde
8 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Pollution 173
- Biotechnology 98
- Pharmacology 128
- Microbiology 40
- Toxicology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Wilde
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Wilde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Wilde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Wilde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Wilde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Wilde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Wilde. The network helps show where Christopher Wilde may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Wilde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 299 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 11 |
About Christopher Wilde
Christopher Wilde is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pollution, Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and Genetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (1 paper) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (173 citations), Biotechnology (98 citations), Pharmacology (128 citations), Microbiology (40 citations) and Toxicology (14 citations). Christopher Wilde has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Joachim Vater, P. Franke, Swaranjit Singh Cameotra, Gerhard Bringmann, Frank Bernhard, Ute Hentschel, Barbara Adler, J. Hofemeister, Xuewen Gao and Alan M. Allgeier. Their work appears in journals such as Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Biochemistry, Marine Biotechnology, Nature Chemical Biology and Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.