Amanda Jones

103 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Amanda Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Microbiology 167
  • Biological Psychiatry 113
  • Biotechnology 355
  • Pharmacology 616
  • Endocrinology 132
Replace Michael J. Davis with:
Michael J. Davis United States
Leonardo Mancabelli Italy
Gabriele Andrea Lugli Italy
Colin P. Smith United Kingdom
Frank Schuren Netherlands
Anthony A. Fodor United States
Kim D. Thompson United Kingdom
Bridget M. Barker United States
Robert W. Blakesley United States
David A. Sela United States
Amanda Jones relative to Michael J. Davis United States Michael J. Davis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Michael J. Davis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Jones. The network helps show where Amanda Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Jones Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996311
2 2008195
3 2009158
4 2008139
5 2011134
6 1981132
7 2005120
8 202291
9 201689
10 200386
11 200983
12 201682
13 200973
14 199364
15 200760
16 199458
17 200656
18 201055
19 200654
20 201153

About Amanda Jones

Amanda Jones is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 112 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (19 papers), Actinomycetales infections and treatment (14 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (12 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (6 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (5 papers) and Infectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (167 citations), Biological Psychiatry (113 citations), Biotechnology (355 citations), Pharmacology (616 citations) and Endocrinology (132 citations). Amanda Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Goodfellow, Donald E. Woods, Terrance Beveridge, John D. Perry, Alan T. Bull, Roselyn Brown, Hans‐Peter Fiedler, Iain C. Sutcliffe, I. C. McManus and Jill Cottrell. Their work appears in journals such as INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, The Journal of Antibiotics, Infection and Immunity and Palliative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact